'I was very surprised and quite glad to hear that,
from the Commission point of view, universities will continue to play a very
strong role in the innovative process,' Yves Poullet, a professor of law at
the universities of Namur and Liège in Belgium told CORDIS News on 12 November.
Professor Poullet had been responsible for moderating a
round table on research and innovation at the event to launch the Sixth
Framework Programme (FP6) in Brussels on 13 November. He found that a
discussion on the 'Jeckyll and Hyde' role of researchers had been particularly
beneficial to those who attended the session.
The observation was raised by Anders Flodström, Director of
the Royal Institute of Technology in at Stockholm University. Describing the
Swedish model as 'unique', Professor Flodström described how a political decision
not to create research institutes has seen universities taking on that role.
'Swedish researchers have a Jeckyll and Hyde role,' said
Professor Flodström. 'In the morning they can carry out free research, and in
the afternoon they are doing strategic contract research.' Professor Flodström
compared the situation in Europe with that in the USA, and particularly at
the renowned Stanford University, where 'money is coming in without ties.' In
Europe on the other hand, 'they [enterprises] are paying for something so you
have to achieve something. It's contractual.'
'I think it is a very big problem within universities for
a professor to play an active role in the development of the relationship between
universities and enterprise,' Professor Poullet told CORDIS New, emphasising
that the problem 'needs to be addressed directly within the universities. [...]
You have a university dedicated to education and basic research. Apart from
these activities, a certain number of academics would also like to develop
research activities in cooperation with enterprise,' he said.
Jürgen Wüst, Managing Director of KEIM in Germany explained
why some universities may be against their staff also having a role in
industry. 'Teaching is the most important thing at universities - the quality
and the students. We shouldn't forget this.' He called however for a 'creative
core' of professors to be embedded in the technology transfer process.
Attitudes towards joint university and industry roles are, as
one may expect, different across Europe. In Italy, university staff are not
allowed to sit on a company board of directors. Professor Poullet pointed to a
study initiated by DG Enterprise 'which indicates clearly that more than 28 per
cent of spin-offs are located in the UK and have been developed by universities
in the UK. 'When you compare these figures with the figures in southern countries,
it's incredible,' he said. 'So it seems that the culture in English universities
is more open to relationships with companies and with external bodies,' concluded
Professor Poullet.
Professor Poullet has personal experience of the difficulties
that such cultural differences can cause as he is currently involved in the
creation of an inter-university network. 'We are discussing with Norwegian
people, English people, Spanish people and German people. All these partners
have different mentalities, different legal structures, different social
statutes for the researcher. It is really very difficult to create these
pan-European institutes that we would like to have.' Professor Poullet does
however believe that such networks are fundamental to innovation.
Rachel Fletcher, Managing Director of Beta Technologies,
the UK national contact point for small and medium sized enterprises
(SMEs), highlighted the issue of expectations, both on the part of enterprises
and universities, and the impact that these can have on relationships.
'There is a difference between what industry expects and wants,'
said Ms Fletcher. They expect excellent research, a commitment to the project and
for the results to be on time, she explained. In addition, they also want short
term submission, as it is very difficult for enterprises, particularly SMEs, to
think in terms of five year projects.
Industry also wants multidisciplinary research, said Ms Fletcher, as the research
it requires often relates to a number of university departments. 'But all SMEs
are different,' claimed Ms Fletcher. 'It is not possible for universities to say
'if we work like this, we'll be able to work with SMEs',' she emphasised.
Discussing the role of innovation in the FP6, Enterprise
Director-General Jean-Paul Mingasson claimed that 'it is natural that innovation
should form an integral part of the Sixth Framework Programme.' It is important that
European innovation policy should reinforce the innovation base through networking and
experiment with new approaches in order to stimulate innovation, he added.
Director of DG Enterprise's innovation unit Giulio Grata
commented that the large turnout for the innovation session, certainly more
than 1.4 per cent of the conference participants, the percentage of FP6 funds
which shall be channelled towards innovation showed that 'the topic of
innovation is a serious one and that no opportunity must be missed to
exchange views.'
Under FP6's first specific programme, 10 million euro will
be available for innovation activities, explained Dr Grata. The funding will
be used to carry out further studies on specific innovation policy issues, including
analysis of the administrative and regulatory environment. The innovation unit
will also continue the Community Innovation Survey and the Trend Chart on
Innovation in Europe. Networking players and users will continue to be a priority,
under such initiatives as the Pilot action of excellence for innovative start-ups
(PAXIS) and the Gate2Growth incubator forum. Transregional cooperation will be
encouraged and the unit will continue to provide support through the innovation
relay centres, helpdesks and CORDIS.
In order to analyse and evaluate innovation in EU funded
research projects, integrated projects under FP6 should be regarded as 'a
large-scale laboratory for innovation,' said Dr Grata.
Deputy Director-General of DG Enterprise, Heinz Zourek,
concluded the session with a plea to national governments to 'go ahead with
the Community patent and not to sit around talking about political and
unimportant (except politically) issues such as language.'
Data Source Provider : CORDIS News attendance at the
FP6 launch conference
Document Reference : Based on CORDIS News attendance at the FP6 launch conference
For further information, please visit: http://www.cordis.lu/innovation
| Asociación Unitec - Miembro de: |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|